California Amends PAGA to Permit Employers to Cure Certain Labor Code Violations
California's Governor Jerry Brown recently signed into law a bill that allows employers to "cure" certain technical defects in employee wage statements. Effective immediately, employers have 33 days to remedy those defects before an employee may seek to recover civil penalties under California's Private Attorney General Act (PAGA).
Background on PAGA and Labor Code Section 226
PAGA gives individual employees the right to recover civil penalties on behalf of themselves and other "aggrieved" employees for certain violations of the Labor Code, including violations of Labor Code Section 226. Before doing so, however, an employee must first provide written notice to his or her employer and the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) detailing the alleged violation.
Section 226 of the Labor Code requires employers to furnish certain information on employee wage statements. Section 226(a)(6) mandates that each wage statement shall include "the name and address of the legal entity that is the employer." Section 226(a)(8) further requires employers to specify "the inclusive dates of the period for which the employee is paid."
Effect of the new law
The new law amends PAGA to provide employers 33 days to cure any violation of Sections 226(a)(6) & (8). The cure period runs from the postmarked date of an employee's written notice to the LWDA of the alleged violation. To cure a violation, the employer must provide to each affected employee a "fully compliant, itemized wage statement to each aggrieved employee for each pay period for the three-year period prior to the date of the written notice."
Under the new law, employers may only cure such violations once within a 12-month period. Employers should also note that the new law only limits the recovery of PAGA penalties. It does not affect an employee's right to seek statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226(e) for violations of Section 226(a)(6) & (8).
Next steps for employers
Employers who receive a written notice alleging violations of Sections 226(a)(6) or (8) should immediately consult with counsel to determine whether the employer should seek to cure the alleged violation(s). To discuss these issues further or pose questions about this alert, please contact one of the attorneys listed above.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.