Kaitland Kennelly

Kaitland defends companies in class actions, high-stakes commercial disputes, and investigations and enforcement actions by state and federal agencies. Kaitland’s clients range from early-stage startups to publicly traded companies representing numerous industries, including financial services, consumer goods, life sciences and software as a service. Kaitland deploys a business-focused approach to litigation and helps her clients achieve their strategic objectives at all stages of a dispute. Kaitland also maintains an active pro bono practice, focusing primarily on immigration, LGBTQ+ and reproductive justice matters.

Kaitland’s representative matters include:

• Defending multiple fintech companies in federal class actions and cases brought by state AGs alleging violations of state and federal lending laws
• Defending an insurance company in a New York False Claims Act action arising from alleged violations of New York’s abandoned property law
• Defending a consumer electronics company in a class action alleging breach of warranty and violations of New York and Nevada consumer protection statutes
• Defending a mortgage lender in a class action alleging violations of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and New York’s consumer protection statute
• Defending a late-stage biopharmaceutical company in a Delaware trade secrets action
• Defending a former state senator in connection with criminal investigation by the New Hampshire AG and related license-revocation proceeding
• Defending a mortgage lender in a class action alleging violations of the New Jersey mortgage lending statute
• Defending a former executive of a pharmaceutical company in an SEC investigation, securities class action and related opt-out cases
• Representing an executive of a large entertainment company in an antitrust investigation by the DOJ
• Defending a consumer electronics company in a class action alleging violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
• Representing a luxury goods company in a trade secrets action against a competitor
• Defending a video-conferencing service provider in FTC, state AGs and international regulatory investigations concerning the company’s practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act