Wall Street Journal Reports Delay in Adoption of General Solicitation Rules
By Cydney Posner
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the SEC plans to delay adoption of new rules that would eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Reg D and Rule 144A. (See my email of July 3, 2012.) Elimination of the ban was mandated by the JOBS Act. The vote has long been scheduled for August 22, and, as of now, remains on the SEC agenda for that open meeting, perhaps now only as a proposal.
Although the SEC had not floated any proposal, the plan had been to adopt the rules on August 22 (as interim final rules?) and solicit public comment at the same time. However, in testimony before Congress, SEC Chair Mary Schapiro indicated that the SEC now plans to solicit public comment on a proposal before issuing final rules. According to the article, the final rules could still be in place as early as this fall. The reason given by the SEC for the delay was that "implementing rules too hastily could expose the agency to court challenges." The result is just a bit ironic given that the Chamber of Commerce, which instilled in the SEC its fear of just such court challenges, applauded adoption of the JOBS Act.
The article reports that "[i]nvestor advocates and state securities regulators this past week urged the SEC to take a slower approach to repealing the ban and to consider imposing restrictions on fund advertising, arguing that unfettered marketing of unregistered securities increases the potential for fraud. They noted that the agency has missed other deadlines, such as in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul." According to the article, Republican lawmakers accused the SEC of abdicating its responsibility and "ignoring the will of Congress and the President." Hearings on the matter are planned.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction, and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) in accordance with our AI Principles, may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.