New SEC CDI Regarding Say on Pay
By Cydney Posner
The SEC has posted one new CDI regarding the correct description of the say-on-pay vote for proxy cards and voting instruction forms. The following are examples of advisory vote descriptions that the SEC views to be consistent with requirements of Rule 14a-21:
To approve the company's executive compensation
- Advisory approval of the company's executive compensation
- Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation
- Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation
The following example is not consistent with Rule 14a-21, in the SEC's view:
- To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation
What's wrong with it? It is not clear what shareholders are being asked to vote on, that is, shareholders could interpret it to ask for a vote on whether to hold a vote, not whether to actually approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.