News

Kronish Lieb Wins Two Significant Victories in Mercator Case

News Brief
July 8, 2004

On Friday, July 2, 2004, a team of Kronish Lieb litigators won two significant victories on behalf of client James Giffen who is being prosecuted by the U.S. government in a highly-watched case relating to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Government of Kazakhstan.

In the first decision, United States District Judge William H. Pauley III dismissed the charges pending against Mr. Giffen that relied on a theory that the citizens of Kazakhstan had been deprived of the honest services of their government officials. The defense argued that such a theory of fraud was not permitted under the relevant statute and was unconstitutionally vague. In granting the defense's request that the government prosecution’s theory be rejected, Judge Pauley wrote: “In effect, the Government urges that American notions of honesty in public service developed over two centuries be engrafted on Kazakh jurisprudence.”

The Judge also granted the defense’s request to review documents in possession of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that relate to Mr. Giffen's activities on behalf of the United States.  It  is undisputed that Mr. Giffen provided assistance to the CIA and other agencies of the U.S. government and that he served as an intermediary between the highest officials in Kazakhstan and the United States.  In ordering that the defense be permitted to review these materials, Judge Pauley noted that: “The Government does not dispute the fact that Giffen had frequent contacts with senior intelligence officials of the United States, or that he used his ties within the Kazakh government to assist the United States."

Mr. Giffen is represented by Kronish Lieb lawyers William J. SchwartzSteven M. CohenScott PashmanMatthew Beck and Kevin Galbraith.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.