Press Release

Cooley Team Secures Victory for Qualcomm in Securities Class Action

February 11, 2022

San Diego – February 11, 2022 – Cooley secured a victory for its longtime client Qualcomm, a San Diego-based technology company that specializes in semiconductors, in a securities class action that was filed by Broadcom in the US District Court for the Southern District of California. Partners Steven Strauss, Koji Fukumura and Peter Adams and associates Stephen Richards and Julie Veroff led the Cooley team representing Qualcomm. Fukumura argued both in district court and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit appeal.

In 2017, Singapore-based Broadcom made an unsolicited offer to buy Qualcomm, which quickly rejected the offer because it undervalued the company and came with too much regulatory risk. Broadcom mounted a proxy fight to replace the entire Qualcomm board at an upcoming shareholder meeting. Consistent with its public stance on regulatory risk, Qualcomm asked the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States in January 2018 to review Broadcom’s effort to seize control of the board.

Broadcom filed a putative securities fraud class action in June 2018, contending that Qualcomm’s statements about its willingness to negotiate with Broadcom and the regulatory risk involved in any potential deal were materially false or misleading because Qualcomm did not disclose that it had asked CFIUS to investigate Broadcom’s attempt to take over Qualcomm’s board.

Cooley filed a motion to dismiss, which was granted in March 2020. The judge held that Broadcom had failed to adequately plead two essential elements of a securities fraud claim. A second amended complaint was dismissed with prejudice by a second judge. Cooley continued to defend Qualcomm on appeal, where the team achieved a complete victory.

The Ninth Circuit confirmed that a lawful and appropriate notice to CFIUS cannot be transformed into securities fraud absent any sufficient pleading of falsity, scienter or loss causation. In so doing, the appellate court made clear that a company can simultaneously negotiate a deal in good faith and harbor genuine regulatory concerns about any ultimate deal reached by the parties.

About Cooley LLP

Clients partner with Cooley on transformative deals, complex IP and regulatory matters, and high-stakes litigation, where innovation meets the law.

Cooley has 1,500 lawyers across 17 offices in the United States, Asia and Europe.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.