Press Release

Federal Circuit Affirms Wyze’s Complete Victory in Patent Infringement Dispute

July 22, 2021

Palo Alto – July 22, 2021 – Last week, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed Cooley client Wyze Labs’ complete victory against Sensormatic Electronics in a patent infringement dispute. In an opinion written by US Circuit Judge Alan D. Lourie, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court order granting Wyze’s Section 101 motion that invalidated five Sensormatic patents. Reuben Chen and Erik Milch led the Cooley team advising Wyze.

Sensormatic sued Wyze, the creator of several smart home technology systems, in the US District Court for the District of Delaware in 2019. Sensormatic alleged that Wyze’s successful camera and sensor products, part of Wyze’s core product offerings, along with Wyze’s home-grown mobile applications, infringed Sensormatic’s asserted patents.

However, the Cooley team filed a Section 101 motion to invalidate all asserted patent claims, which was granted by US District Judge Colm F. Connolly. While the appeal was pending, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board also instituted all five inter partes review petitions filed by the Cooley team. After full briefing on the appeal and an oral argument in June 2021, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion last week in favor of Wyze, affirming Judge Connolly’s order invalidating Sensormatic’s patents.

Founded in 2017, Seattle-based Wyze aims to make smart home tech accessible to everyone. Its high-quality, affordable smart home products include the Wyze Cam, Wyze Cam Pan, Wyze Sense, Wyze Bulb and Wyze Plug.

About Cooley LLP

Clients partner with Cooley on transformative deals, complex IP and regulatory matters, and high-stakes litigation, where innovation meets the law.

Cooley has 1,300 lawyers across 17 offices in the United States, Asia and Europe.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.