Petitions for Rehearing En Banc Filed in Conflict Minerals Cases
By Cydney Posner
In the lawsuit filed by the National Association of Manufacturers, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable against the SEC in connection with the conflict minerals rules, both the SEC and Amnesty International (as Intervenors-Appellees) have filed petitions with the D.C. Circuit requesting a rehearing en banc regarding the majority opinion's invalidation on First Amendment grounds of the requirement in the conflict minerals rules to disclose whether products are DRC conflict free. Both petitioners requested that the court hold the petitions in abeyance pending issuance of the en banc decision in another case (American Meat Institute) on the same legal issue -- the applicable standard of review for compelled commercial speech disclosures where deception of consumers is not an issue. You might recall that the majority opinion had almost invited the "parties in this case to participate in the court's en banc consideration of this important First Amendment Question." It is possible that the court may consolidate the cases so that all parties could participate in the en banc proceeding. (See these Cooley Alerts https://www.cooley.com/SEC-final-rules-on-conflict-materials-disclosure-expected-to-have-broad-impact, https://www.cooley.com/SEC-issues-guidance-on-conflict-minerals-rules, https://www.cooley.com/SECs-conflict-minerals-rules-survive-court-challenge and https://www.cooley.com/key-part-of-SECs-conflict-minerals-rules-struck-down-on-dirst-amendment-grounds.)
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.