News

USSCT Decides Amgen Case Re Class Certification

News Brief
February 27, 2013

By Cydney Posner

From Bloomberg and Reuters,  the USSCT, by a 6-3 vote, upheld a 9th circuit decision and allowed shareholders of Amgen to proceed with a securities class action without first having to show that misinformation had materially and fraudulently inflated Amgen's stock price. "Writing for the court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, said it would ‘waste judicial resources' to require investors to show that an alleged deception affected stock prices before a case could go forward as a class action. Amgen's position 'would necessitate a mini-trial' at a preliminary stage in the litigation, she wrote." Justice Ginsburg said "early stages of class-action litigation are meant simply to ensure that cases are litigated fairly and efficiently. Amgen 'would have us put the cart before the horse,' she wrote. ‘Congress, we count it significant, has addressed the settlement pressures associated with securities-fraud class actions through means other than requiring proof of materiality at the class-certification stage.'" Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas dissented. Reuters comments that the "decision also breaks a recent trend by the court to narrow class-action litigation."

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.