PCAOB on trial
By Cydney Posner
Bloomberg and New York Times published articles describing yesterday's Supreme Court hearing on the constitutionality of the PCAOB.
The constitutional question is whether the President can exercise sufficient authority over the agency to satisfy the separation of powers and appointments clauses. If the Court rules against the PCAOB, Congress could simply reauthorize the agency with a more compliant structure. However, since the PCAOB was created under SOX, Congress would have the "opportunity" to revisit SOX entirely, potentially leading to changes in the law: for example, SOX 404 on internal controls has drawn much criticism, especially as applied to smaller companies, and is a much-discussed candidate for revision in the midst of a deep recession. The articles report that a decision is expected in June or July.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as "Cooley"). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction, and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. When advising companies, our attorney-client relationship is with the company, not with any individual. This content may have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence (Al) in accordance with our Al Principles, may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.