Congress debates compensation
By Cydney Posner You might be interested in this article from the NYT reporting on the "ideological clash" at a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee during which lawmakers debated whether executive pay should be curbed at all companies, not just those receiving federal money.
The article reports that Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the chairman of the committee, urged the committee to come up with a bill that would alter the structure of executive pay before the Congressional summer recess: " 'I believe the structure of compensation is flawed,' Mr. Frank said. 'Namely, we have had a system of compensation for top decision makers in which they are very well rewarded if they take a risk that pays off but suffer no penalty if they take a risk that costs the company money.' " Many Republicans on the committee "generally said they approved setting compensation limits on those companies that took money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, [but] they stopped short of supporting legislation that would broadly change corporate governance practices." The White House has previously stated that the administration does not want to cap executive pay. Gene Sperling, counselor to the Treasury secretary, said that although "Wall Street may be the focus of the pay debate right now,...the problem was much wider. 'While the financial sector has been at the center of this issue, we believe that compensation practices must be better aligned with long-term value and prudent risk management at all firms, and not just for the financial services industry,' Mr. Sperling said."
This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as "Cooley"). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction, and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. When advising companies, our attorney-client relationship is with the company, not with any individual. This content may have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence (Al) in accordance with our Al Principles, may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.