Press Release

Cooley Scores Pretrial Win for Gevo in Patent Suit

March 27, 2013

Palo Alto, Calif. – March 27, 2013 – Cooley LLP announced today that it achieved a major victory when it secured a judgment of no infringement on behalf of leading renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels client Gevo, Inc. in a patent suit brought by Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC ("Butamax"), a joint venture between BP and DuPont.

On March 19, 2013, a Delaware federal judge issued a favorable claim construction ruling for Gevo, granting Gevo partial summary judgment of no infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, and ruling that two key claims of the Butamax patents were invalid. Although the Court did not grant summary judgment of no literal infringement, Butamax acknowledged that it could not prove literal infringement under the Court's claim construction and agreed to stipulate to a judgment of no literal infringement.

In January 2011, Butamax filed a patent infringement suit against Gevo asserting two patents relating to the production of isobutanol, a four-carbon alcohol, in microorganisms. Gevo produces its isobutanol using proprietary recombinant yeast that is genetically engineered to produce it at a high yield. In June 2012, the Court denied Butamax's request for a preliminary injunction against Gevo, a decision that was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in December 2012. A trial date was set for early April 2013.

"This judgment marks yet another great step forward for Gevo," said Jim Brogan, partner and chair of the Intellectual Property group. "The ruling enables this highly innovative company to continue to focus on its growth and the development of innovative biofuels products."

The cross-office Cooley team representing Gevo is led by Chairman Stephen Neal and partners Michelle Rhyu and Jim Brogan; and includes partners Ben Damstedt, Bonnie Weiss McLeod, and Matthew Brigham; and associates Adam Pivovar, Daniel Knauss, Carolyn Juarez, Tryn Stimart, Josh Marcus, Melissa Harwood, Kathryn Duvall, Neil Desai, Adam Trigg and Andrew Keith.  

A separate patent re-examination team has obtained rejections of all challenged claims of the two asserted Butamax patents from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. 

About Cooley LLP

Cooley's 700 attorneys have an entrepreneurial spirit and deep, substantive experience, and are committed to solving clients' most challenging legal matters. From small companies with big ideas to international enterprises with diverse legal needs, Cooley has the breadth of legal resources to enable companies of all sizes to seize opportunities in today's global marketplace. The firm represents clients across a broad array of dynamic industry sectors, including technology, life sciences, venture capital, clean energy, real estate and retail.

The firm has full-service offices in eleven major business and technology centers: Boston, MA; Broomfield, CO; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; Palo Alto, CA; Reston, VA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; Seattle, WA; Washington, DC; and Shanghai, China.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.