|
Matthew J. Brigham is a partner in the Intellectual Property Litigation practice group and a member of Cooley Godward Kronish's Litigation department. He joined the Firm in 2003 and is resident in the Palo Alto office.
His practice focuses on patent litigation counseling for high technology clients. He has represented clients in technologies such as analog integrated circuits, semiconductor processing, PC chipsets, video game hardware and software, e-commerce solutions, programmable semiconductor chips, and electronic design automation. Mr. Brigham services the patent litigation needs of individual inventors, emerging ventures, large corporations, and companies involved in multiple defendant patent infringement actions. Mr. Brigham also assists clients in complex commercial litigation matters involving merger and acquisition agreements.
Mr. Brigham has represented clients in lawsuits pending in state and federal courts throughout the country, including patent infringement trials in California, Virginia, and the International Trade Commission. He is a registered patent attorney and has been involved in patent reexamination proceedings before the Patent and Trademark Office and interference proceedings before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Mr. Brigham has also argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Mr. Brigham's recent cases include:
-
Saxon Innovations v. Nokia, et al. (E.D. Texas) - counsel for defendant game consule manufacturer in patent infringement action involving wireless and processor technology.
-
CSIRO v. Toshiba, et al., (E.D. Texas) - counsel for defendant game console manufacturer in patent infringement action involving wireless technology.
-
Linex v. Belair, et al., (E.D. Texas) - counsel for defendant in patent infringement action involving wireless technology.
-
Broadcom v. Qualcomm, (ITC) - counsel for respondent in ITC enforcement proceeding involving baseband processing chips.
-
Qualcomm v. Nokia, (E.D. Texas) - counsel for plaintiff in patent infringement action involving mobile telephone technology.
-
Knova Software v. Inquira, (D. Del.) - counsel for defendant in patent infringement action involving database management tools.
-
02 Micro International v. Monolithic Power Systems, et al., (E.D. Texas and N.D. Cal) - counsel for multiple defendants in patent infringement action involving DC/AC converter circuits.
-
Micrel Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, et al., (N.D. Cal.) – counsel for defendants in patent infringement and breach of confidentiality agreement action involving semiconductor processing technology.
- OPTi, Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation, (E.D. Texas) – counsel for defendant in patent infringement action involving PC chipset technology.
- AVG v. Electronic Arts, et al.; AVG v. Sony, et al., (E.D. Texas) – counsel for defendant in patent infringement actions involving alleged video game technology.
- ASAT Inc. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Commission, (ITC and D.C. Cir.) – counsel for third-party in subpoena enforcement proceeding.
- MoSys v. Synopsys, (Del. Ch.) – counsel for defendant in lawsuit stemming from merger agreement.
Mr. Brigham received his law degree from the University of California, Davis. Prior to attending law school, he received his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, San Diego.
Mr. Brigham is admitted to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and is a member of the State Bar of California.
Education- University of California, Davis School of Law
JD, 1997 - University of California, San Diego
BS Mechanical Engineering, 1994
Court Admissions
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Admissions
- California
- Registered to practice before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)
|